Sometimes, satire can be uncomfortable. If you have to sharply inhale or even wince while reading or watching something satirical, you're not alone. While going through some of The Onion article titles, I looked a little something like this:
Like it was funny, but... yikes. |
Anyways, as is common on social media, the production of memes are increasing. And with the increasing polarization of the right versus the left, memes are becoming more and more extreme. For example, take Pepe the Frog. I remember the good ol' days when this meme was sent on group chats and posted on social media in a wholesome, good natured way. However, people started using Pepe for alt-right memes, going wayyy too far. This resulted in Pepe the Frog being deemed a hate symbol by the Anti-Defamation League. Interestingly, a campaign has been started partly by the creator of Pepe to reclaim him from the depths of white supremacist memes.
Now the question comes: how far is too far? It's interesting that although the image that symbolized alt-right was banned, its presence is still running rampant on all forms of social media. Although the first amendment guarantees protection, just because you can say something, does that mean you should?
I like this post! In class we discussed using satire as a form of discussing issues that may be too severe or sensitive to directly confront, but I agree that even satire can have a dark and counterproductive side. Well done!
ReplyDeleteEliya, this was my first time on your blog and I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed reading the posts! Your voice as a writer is unique and extremely engaging. The way you linked the questionable nature of satire to Pepe the Frog is not only entertaining, but also extremely clever and relevant!
ReplyDeleteThank youuu I'm so glad you enjoyed my posts!!!
DeleteI like how you connected satire to the debate between free speech and hate speech. Some satire may be very offensive to some people but what can really be done to stop it? Good job!
ReplyDelete